Local distribution
APC leads 1, LP leads 11 of 12 ward rollups in Calabar South.
Cross River · Permanent place record
Calabar South election results
The Calabar South 2023 presidential rollup contains 301 of 301 polling units in Mundx’s inventory (100.0%). LP leads the four-party dataset with 22,063 votes (64.5%), ahead of APC by 13,899. The ward table below covers all 12 wards recorded for this Cross River local area.
Twelve (12)
9,123 four-party votes across 77 represented polling units.
Three (3)
LP leads APC by 15 votes. 0 wards have at least one unresolved polling-unit record.
Local rollup
Four-party totals
| Party | Votes in rollup | Four-party share |
|---|---|---|
| LP | 22,063 | 64.5% |
| APC | 8,164 | 23.9% |
| PDP | 3,797 | 11.1% |
| NNPP | 161 | 0.5% |
| Four-party total | 34,185 | 100.0% |
Ward evidence
Results by ward
Each row reports only polling units represented in the four-party source snapshot. The coverage column keeps missing records visible.
| Ward | Leader | APC | LP | PDP | NNPP | Four-party total | PUs represented | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eight (8) | LP | 615 | 1,660 | 411 | 7 | 2,693 | 19 / 19 | 100.0% |
| Eleven (11) | LP | 1,900 | 4,018 | 682 | 28 | 6,628 | 65 / 65 | 100.0% |
| Five (5) | LP | 375 | 882 | 224 | 12 | 1,493 | 12 / 12 | 100.0% |
| Four (4) | LP | 300 | 316 | 148 | 1 | 765 | 10 / 10 | 100.0% |
| Nine (9) | LP | 730 | 2,026 | 324 | 8 | 3,088 | 23 / 23 | 100.0% |
| One (1) | LP | 441 | 1,026 | 218 | 35 | 1,720 | 22 / 22 | 100.0% |
| Seven (7) | LP | 207 | 1,126 | 109 | 4 | 1,446 | 14 / 14 | 100.0% |
| Six (6) | LP | 411 | 1,573 | 172 | 15 | 2,171 | 18 / 18 | 100.0% |
| Ten (10) | LP | 437 | 1,745 | 177 | 8 | 2,367 | 18 / 18 | 100.0% |
| Three (3) | LP | 603 | 618 | 307 | 5 | 1,533 | 13 / 13 | 100.0% |
| Twelve (12) | LP | 1,539 | 6,799 | 752 | 33 | 9,123 | 77 / 77 | 100.0% |
| Two (2) | APC | 606 | 274 | 273 | 5 | 1,158 | 10 / 10 | 100.0% |
Ward notes
The largest ward rollups in Calabar South
These notes restate the largest 8 ward records in prose so the leader, margin and source coverage remain understandable outside the table.
- Twelve (12): LP leads with 6,799 of 9,123 four-party votes (74.5%), a margin of 5,260 over APC. The rollup represents 77 of 77 polling units. No polling-unit inventory gap remains in this source snapshot.
- Eleven (11): LP leads with 4,018 of 6,628 four-party votes (60.6%), a margin of 2,118 over APC. The rollup represents 65 of 65 polling units. No polling-unit inventory gap remains in this source snapshot.
- Nine (9): LP leads with 2,026 of 3,088 four-party votes (65.6%), a margin of 1,296 over APC. The rollup represents 23 of 23 polling units. No polling-unit inventory gap remains in this source snapshot.
- Eight (8): LP leads with 1,660 of 2,693 four-party votes (61.6%), a margin of 1,045 over APC. The rollup represents 19 of 19 polling units. No polling-unit inventory gap remains in this source snapshot.
- Ten (10): LP leads with 1,745 of 2,367 four-party votes (73.7%), a margin of 1,308 over APC. The rollup represents 18 of 18 polling units. No polling-unit inventory gap remains in this source snapshot.
- Six (6): LP leads with 1,573 of 2,171 four-party votes (72.5%), a margin of 1,162 over APC. The rollup represents 18 of 18 polling units. No polling-unit inventory gap remains in this source snapshot.
- One (1): LP leads with 1,026 of 1,720 four-party votes (59.7%), a margin of 585 over APC. The rollup represents 22 of 22 polling units. No polling-unit inventory gap remains in this source snapshot.
- Three (3): LP leads with 618 of 1,533 four-party votes (40.3%), a margin of 15 over APC. The rollup represents 13 of 13 polling units. No polling-unit inventory gap remains in this source snapshot.
Polling-unit distribution
What sits beneath the ward totals
Four-party leaders
APC leads 56, LP leads 242, PDP leads 3 of 301 represented polling-unit records.
Selected records
CCIJ: 269, MARK: 32. The canonical map policy selects complete CCIJ observations before complete Mark Essien observations.
Available context
Accredited-voter values are present for 301 records and registered-voter values for 301. Where present, their sums are 41,694 accredited and 161,463 registered.
Largest represented units
Top 10 polling-unit rollups
This is a size ranking within the four-party dataset, not an official turnout ranking. Accredited and registered values appear only where the selected source record contains them.
| Polling unit | Ward | Leader | Four-party votes | Accredited | Registered | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
09-09-08-005Edibe-Edibe/Eyo Ita Street | Eight (8) | LP | 321 | 328 | 1,436 | CCIJ |
09-09-08-009Fenton By Edgerley | Eight (8) | LP | 316 | 331 | 1,152 | CCIJ |
09-09-12-005Ekpo Abasi/Yellow Duke Junction | Twelve (12) | LP | 311 | 324 | 1,429 | MARK |
09-09-09-009African Field | Nine (9) | LP | 302 | 332 | 1,137 | CCIJ |
09-09-12-042Uwanse/Ekpo Eyo Junction | Twelve (12) | LP | 294 | 311 | 1,103 | MARK |
09-09-12-039Abasi Edem/Akparika Junction | Twelve (12) | LP | 290 | 311 | 1,140 | CCIJ |
09-09-12-021Unical Staff School | Twelve (12) | LP | 287 | 289 | 1,174 | CCIJ |
09-09-10-007Academy/Atu Junction | Ten (10) | LP | 275 | 315 | 1,073 | CCIJ |
09-09-09-011Wilkie/Ephraim Street | Nine (9) | LP | 262 | 266 | 884 | CCIJ |
09-09-04-006Henshaw Square | Four (4) | LP | 252 | 272 | 829 | CCIJ |
Source boundary
What these figures mean
This page reports Mundx’s four-party polling-unit rollup for the 2023 presidential election. It covers APC, LP, PDP and NNPP observations selected from the CCIJ audit and the Mark Essien volunteer collation, matched to the INEC polling-unit inventory.
- This is not the official INEC collated result.
- Votes for the other fourteen parties are outside this rollup.
- Coverage counts show represented polling units, not turnout.
- Missing records remain visible rather than being estimated.
Reviewed by Mundx Analytics Data Team · 22 September 2026
Reuse status. Mundx Analytics confirms permission to publish and redistribute the source-derived records in this release. No standard open-data licence or third-party bulk-reuse terms are specified.