Local distribution
LP leads 10 of 10 ward rollups in Calabar Municipality.
Cross River · Permanent place record
Calabar Municipality election results
The Calabar Municipality 2023 presidential rollup contains 334 of 334 polling units in Mundx’s inventory (100.0%). LP leads the four-party dataset with 40,366 votes (78.0%), ahead of APC by 34,173. The ward table below covers all 10 wards recorded for this Cross River local area.
Eigth
9,994 four-party votes across 49 represented polling units.
Eigth
LP leads APC by 2,620 votes. 0 wards have at least one unresolved polling-unit record.
Local rollup
Four-party totals
| Party | Votes in rollup | Four-party share |
|---|---|---|
| LP | 40,366 | 78.0% |
| APC | 6,193 | 12.0% |
| PDP | 3,575 | 6.9% |
| NNPP | 1,615 | 3.1% |
| Four-party total | 51,749 | 100.0% |
Ward evidence
Results by ward
Each row reports only polling units represented in the four-party source snapshot. The coverage column keeps missing records visible.
| Ward | Leader | APC | LP | PDP | NNPP | Four-party total | PUs represented | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eigth | LP | 2,717 | 5,337 | 518 | 1,422 | 9,994 | 49 / 49 | 100.0% |
| Five | LP | 433 | 3,534 | 341 | 17 | 4,325 | 28 / 28 | 100.0% |
| Four | LP | 314 | 4,185 | 264 | 17 | 4,780 | 37 / 37 | 100.0% |
| Nine | LP | 253 | 3,669 | 234 | 29 | 4,185 | 21 / 21 | 100.0% |
| One | LP | 377 | 4,235 | 425 | 17 | 5,054 | 43 / 43 | 100.0% |
| Seven | LP | 407 | 3,578 | 339 | 23 | 4,347 | 24 / 24 | 100.0% |
| Six | LP | 445 | 4,474 | 344 | 18 | 5,281 | 34 / 34 | 100.0% |
| Ten | LP | 473 | 3,023 | 530 | 42 | 4,068 | 26 / 26 | 100.0% |
| Three | LP | 426 | 3,226 | 347 | 20 | 4,019 | 28 / 28 | 100.0% |
| Two | LP | 348 | 5,105 | 233 | 10 | 5,696 | 44 / 44 | 100.0% |
Ward notes
The largest ward rollups in Calabar Municipality
These notes restate the largest 8 ward records in prose so the leader, margin and source coverage remain understandable outside the table.
- Eigth: LP leads with 5,337 of 9,994 four-party votes (53.4%), a margin of 2,620 over APC. The rollup represents 49 of 49 polling units. No polling-unit inventory gap remains in this source snapshot.
- Two: LP leads with 5,105 of 5,696 four-party votes (89.6%), a margin of 4,757 over APC. The rollup represents 44 of 44 polling units. No polling-unit inventory gap remains in this source snapshot.
- Six: LP leads with 4,474 of 5,281 four-party votes (84.7%), a margin of 4,029 over APC. The rollup represents 34 of 34 polling units. No polling-unit inventory gap remains in this source snapshot.
- One: LP leads with 4,235 of 5,054 four-party votes (83.8%), a margin of 3,810 over PDP. The rollup represents 43 of 43 polling units. No polling-unit inventory gap remains in this source snapshot.
- Four: LP leads with 4,185 of 4,780 four-party votes (87.6%), a margin of 3,871 over APC. The rollup represents 37 of 37 polling units. No polling-unit inventory gap remains in this source snapshot.
- Seven: LP leads with 3,578 of 4,347 four-party votes (82.3%), a margin of 3,171 over APC. The rollup represents 24 of 24 polling units. No polling-unit inventory gap remains in this source snapshot.
- Five: LP leads with 3,534 of 4,325 four-party votes (81.7%), a margin of 3,101 over APC. The rollup represents 28 of 28 polling units. No polling-unit inventory gap remains in this source snapshot.
- Nine: LP leads with 3,669 of 4,185 four-party votes (87.7%), a margin of 3,416 over APC. The rollup represents 21 of 21 polling units. No polling-unit inventory gap remains in this source snapshot.
Polling-unit distribution
What sits beneath the ward totals
Four-party leaders
APC leads 13, LP leads 318, PDP leads 2, NNPP leads 1 of 334 represented polling-unit records.
Selected records
CCIJ: 321, MARK: 13. The canonical map policy selects complete CCIJ observations before complete Mark Essien observations.
Available context
Accredited-voter values are present for 334 records and registered-voter values for 334. Where present, their sums are 52,513 accredited and 191,756 registered.
Largest represented units
Top 10 polling-unit rollups
This is a size ranking within the four-party dataset, not an official turnout ranking. Accredited and registered values appear only where the selected source record contains them.
| Polling unit | Ward | Leader | Four-party votes | Accredited | Registered | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
09-08-08-010Opposite Mobile Police | Eigth | APC | 2,166 | 94 | 750 | MARK |
09-08-08-016Asim Ita/High Way | Eigth | APC | 1,621 | 189 | 750 | MARK |
09-08-10-002St. Augustine Primary School I | Ten | LP | 441 | 461 | 1,866 | CCIJ |
09-08-10-004Ikot Ekpo Junction | Ten | LP | 405 | 421 | 1,389 | CCIJ |
09-08-09-019Open Space Lemna By Hilcrest Seondary School Ikot Effanga | Nine | LP | 393 | 422 | 716 | CCIJ |
09-08-02-026Open Space By C.P Daniel Anyogo Str Children Of Promise | Two | LP | 358 | 362 | 750 | CCIJ |
09-08-10-007Poly Clinic, Ikot Omin | Ten | LP | 352 | 374 | 1,586 | CCIJ |
09-08-09-001Basin Authority Canteen | Nine | LP | 315 | 335 | 868 | CCIJ |
09-08-09-012Open Space Community Technical College Ikot Effanga Mkpa | Nine | LP | 313 | 319 | 750 | CCIJ |
09-08-10-003St. Augustine Primary School Ii | Ten | LP | 310 | 327 | 1,471 | CCIJ |
Source boundary
What these figures mean
This page reports Mundx’s four-party polling-unit rollup for the 2023 presidential election. It covers APC, LP, PDP and NNPP observations selected from the CCIJ audit and the Mark Essien volunteer collation, matched to the INEC polling-unit inventory.
- This is not the official INEC collated result.
- Votes for the other fourteen parties are outside this rollup.
- Coverage counts show represented polling units, not turnout.
- Missing records remain visible rather than being estimated.
Reviewed by Mundx Analytics Data Team · 22 September 2026
Reuse status. Mundx Analytics confirms permission to publish and redistribute the source-derived records in this release. No standard open-data licence or third-party bulk-reuse terms are specified.