The EC8D reproduction
The state values reproduce the collation result for the four named parties. Grade B reflects a corroborated table without a direct scanned EC8D form in the current register.
Final state result · North Central · Two-layer record
Niger 2023 presidential election result
The reproduced Niger EC8D collation records APC first with 375,183 votes and PDP second with 284,898. The declared margin was 90,285 votes. Mundx presents that state declaration beside, but never merged with, a four-party polling-unit research layer.
Result of record: the reproduced state collation. Research evidence: selected PU observations for APC, LP, PDP and NNPP under a documented policy.
Niger reconciliation
Declared totals beside selected PU observations
The declared four-party collation totals 762,369. The canonical PU layer totals 723,063, which is 94.8% of the declared figure and 39,306 below it.
| Party / scope | Declared collation | PU rollup | Declared minus PU | PU as % declared |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| APC | 375,183 | 357,309 | +17,874 | 95.2% |
| LP | 80,452 | 75,074 | +5,378 | 93.3% |
| PDP | 284,898 | 266,027 | +18,871 | 93.4% |
| NNPP | 21,836 | 24,653 | -2,817 | 112.9% |
| Four-party total | 762,369 | 723,063 | +39,306 | 94.8% |
The difference is descriptive, not causal. “Declared minus canonical PU” equals +39,306 for the four tracked parties. It must not be relabelled as missing votes, invalid votes or fraud: the two layers were created at different stages, and the available record does not establish a single cause.
Local evidence
Polling-unit rollups across 25 Niger LGAs
These rows are calculated from selected polling-unit records, not declared LGA collation totals. APC leads 21, LP leads 1 and PDP leads 3 of the 25 local rollups. Each LGA name opens its permanent place page with ward and polling-unit context.
| LGA | PU leader | APC | LP | PDP | NNPP | Four-party | PUs represented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agaie | APC | 12,262 | 142 | 11,197 | 492 | 24,093 | 164 / 164 |
| Agwara | APC | 7,626 | 1,624 | 5,834 | 78 | 15,162 | 70 / 70 |
| Bida | APC | 21,995 | 2,333 | 12,863 | 570 | 37,761 | 270 / 270 |
| Borgu | APC | 21,507 | 1,905 | 9,289 | 357 | 33,058 | 208 / 208 |
| Bosso | APC | 19,209 | 6,490 | 13,777 | 1,384 | 40,860 | 249 / 249 |
| Chanchaga | APC | 25,500 | 10,280 | 19,732 | 2,917 | 58,429 | 379 / 379 |
| Edatti | PDP | 11,208 | 92 | 14,085 | 277 | 25,662 | 119 / 119 |
| Gbako | APC | 11,389 | 722 | 9,942 | 191 | 22,244 | 156 / 156 |
| Gurara | APC | 11,679 | 3,087 | 9,953 | 278 | 24,997 | 150 / 150 |
| Katcha | PDP | 9,011 | 172 | 11,834 | 290 | 21,307 | 149 / 149 |
| Kontagora | APC | 19,141 | 2,621 | 13,682 | 3,663 | 39,107 | 248 / 248 |
| Lapai | APC | 18,229 | 969 | 13,934 | 388 | 33,520 | 193 / 193 |
| Lavun | APC | 15,385 | 795 | 13,026 | 1,206 | 30,412 | 223 / 223 |
| Magama | APC | 12,302 | 2,850 | 8,551 | 1,256 | 24,959 | 189 / 189 |
| Mariga | APC | 12,642 | 711 | 6,294 | 581 | 20,228 | 214 / 214 |
| Mashegu | APC | 12,402 | 891 | 6,946 | 660 | 20,899 | 205 / 205 |
| Mokwa | PDP | 15,657 | 944 | 15,946 | 762 | 33,309 | 187 / 187 |
| Munya | APC | 3,447 | 1,813 | 2,982 | 2,350 | 10,592 | 119 / 119 |
| Paikoro | APC | 19,286 | 5,534 | 12,840 | 2,148 | 39,808 | 232 / 232 |
| Rafi | APC | 16,385 | 987 | 9,217 | 1,470 | 28,059 | 219 / 219 |
| Rijau | APC | 10,531 | 1,979 | 7,450 | 385 | 20,345 | 178 / 178 |
| Shiroro | APC | 17,787 | 5,940 | 9,398 | 706 | 33,831 | 257 / 257 |
| Suleja | LP | 13,973 | 15,332 | 10,918 | 1,455 | 41,678 | 277 / 277 |
| Tafa | APC | 8,925 | 6,306 | 8,573 | 478 | 24,282 | 171 / 171 |
| Wushishi | APC | 9,831 | 555 | 7,764 | 311 | 18,461 | 124 / 124 |
Largest local rollups
Five LGAs in Niger context
The notes restate the largest local aggregations in prose so their leader, margin and evidence coverage remain legible outside the table. A PU-layer lead is not an official LGA declaration.
- Chanchaga: APC leads the selected four-party rollup with 25,500 votes, 5,768 ahead of PDP. The local total is 58,429 across 379 represented units. The selected source layer represents every polling unit in the inventory.
- Suleja: LP leads the selected four-party rollup with 15,332 votes, 1,359 ahead of APC. The local total is 41,678 across 277 represented units. The selected source layer represents every polling unit in the inventory.
- Bosso: APC leads the selected four-party rollup with 19,209 votes, 5,432 ahead of PDP. The local total is 40,860 across 249 represented units. The selected source layer represents every polling unit in the inventory.
- Paikoro: APC leads the selected four-party rollup with 19,286 votes, 6,446 ahead of PDP. The local total is 39,808 across 232 represented units. The selected source layer represents every polling unit in the inventory.
- Kontagora: APC leads the selected four-party rollup with 19,141 votes, 5,459 ahead of PDP. The local total is 39,107 across 248 represented units. The selected source layer represents every polling unit in the inventory.
Reading the Niger record
One contest, two evidence layers
The canonical PU layer
All 4,950 polling units in the inventory have a selected four-party observation. Representation does not authenticate each observation, restore the other fourteen parties or reproduce later collation decisions.
The LGA evidence directory
Chanchaga has the largest local rollup at 58,429. In Mokwa, PDP leads APC by 289 in the closest proportional margin.
Coverage needs a denominator. The least complete local record is Agaie at 100.0% of its inventory. Cite represented and inventory counts when an LGA has unresolved records. Full representation still does not make the rollup an official declaration.
Questions this page answers
Niger result notes
Who led Niger in the declared result?
APC led with 375,183 votes. PDP followed on 284,898, a margin of 90,285. The four tracked parties total 762,369; that subtotal is not the complete eighteen-party vote.
What does the local pattern show?
APC leads 21, LP leads 1 and PDP leads 3 of the 25 LGA rollups. State-wide, APC leads the PU layer with 357,309 of 723,063 four-party votes, 91,282 ahead of PDP. This does not revise the declared leader.
Why can the declared and PU totals differ?
EC8D is a state collation product. Mundx selects complete four-party PU observations, prioritising CCIJ records and then Mark Essien fallbacks. Scope, availability, transcription and later collation steps can differ. The comparison identifies questions; it does not prove a cause.
How should this page be cited?
Use this permanent URL for the Niger declaration and comparison. Name the layer, year and review date. Cite an LGA place record for a local PU claim, and do not call its PU leader a declared winner without a traceable local collation source.
Provenance
What is official, and what Mundx calculated
The declared layer comes from INEC's result collection and a contemporaneous reproduction of the collation table. It is a collation product, not a sum recreated by Mundx.
Mundx's second layer is a four-party aggregation of selected polling-unit observations. It applies policy all-complete-ccij-first-v1: complete CCIJ records take precedence, then complete Mark Essien records fill remaining units.
- INEC 2023 presidential IReV record.
- State/FCT collation reproduction.
- 176,409 represented units from an inventory of 176,846; 437 remain unresolved nationally.
Canonical PU policy all-complete-ccij-first-v1 · CCIJ commit e38e3bc9a22a
Reuse boundary. Mundx Analytics confirms permission to publish and redistribute the source-derived records in this release. No standard open-data licence or third-party bulk-reuse terms are specified.
Published by Mundx Analytics · reviewed by Mundx Analytics Data Team on 22 September 2026 · official sources retrieved 2026-08-20.