Local evidence record · Declaration unavailable

Kuje 2023 presidential election evidence

Mundx's selected polling-unit observations place LP first in Kuje's four-party aggregation with 13,383 votes, ahead of PDP by 3,492. This is not an official area council declaration. The current source register contains no separately sourced Kuje collation record, so the declared-result field remains unavailable.

Result layer
Canonical PU aggregation
Four-party leader
LP · 13,383
PUs represented
262 / 262
Declared area council result
Not in current source register

Evidence status: complete inventory representation for the four selected parties does not make these figures an EC8C, EC8D or other declared collation result.

Kuje PU layer

Four-party polling-unit aggregation

The selected records total 33,125 votes across APC, LP, PDP and NNPP. LP accounts for 40.4% of that four-party sum; PDP accounts for 29.9%.

Kuje canonical four-party polling-unit aggregation
PartySelected PU votesFour-party share
LP13,38340.4%
PDP9,89129.9%
APC9,41128.4%
NNPP4401.3%
Four-party total33,125100.0%
No declared comparison is shown. Mundx will add a declared column only when the source register contains a traceable area council collation record with its authority, form level, retrieval date and confidence.

Ward evidence

How the four-party pattern varies within Kuje

APC leads 3, LP leads 3 and PDP leads 4 of the 10 ward rollups. Every row is calculated from selected PU observations and keeps the representation count beside the vote totals.

Canonical four-party polling-unit aggregation by Kuje ward
WardPU leaderAPCLPPDPNNPPFour-partyPUs represented
ChibiriLP1,4222,5817772355,01542 / 42
GaubeLP1,3863,0311,871326,32043 / 43
Gudun KaryaPDP8851302,548153,57820 / 20
GwargwadaAPC56418480571,11910 / 10
KabiAPC1,039146530121,72716 / 16
KujeLP1,3756,5381,190599,16276 / 76
KujekwaPDP51090646131,25912 / 12
KwakuAPC98628650061,77812 / 12
RubochiPDP837504854102,20524 / 24
YenchePDP4075949519627 / 7

Largest ward rollups

Five local records in context

These notes restate the largest ward aggregates in prose so their leader, margin and representation remain readable outside the table.

  1. Kuje: LP leads with 6,538 of 9,162 four-party votes, a margin of 5,163 over APC. The rollup represents 76 of 76 inventory units.
  2. Gaube: LP leads with 3,031 of 6,320 four-party votes, a margin of 1,160 over PDP. The rollup represents 43 of 43 inventory units.
  3. Chibiri: LP leads with 2,581 of 5,015 four-party votes, a margin of 1,159 over APC. The rollup represents 42 of 42 inventory units.
  4. Gudun Karya: PDP leads with 2,548 of 3,578 four-party votes, a margin of 1,663 over APC. The rollup represents 20 of 20 inventory units.
  5. Rubochi: PDP leads with 854 of 2,205 four-party votes, a margin of 17 over APC. The rollup represents 24 of 24 inventory units.

Evidence beneath the wards

Largest represented polling-unit rollups

The ten rows below are ordered by four-party vote count. This is not a turnout ranking and does not imply official validation. The source label identifies which selected observation supplied the four party fields.

Ten largest represented polling-unit four-party rollups in Kuje
Polling unitWardPU leaderFour-party votesSelected source
37-04-08-011
Junior Secondary School Huni Gade
Gudun KaryaPDP1,381MARK
37-04-01-014
Forest
KujeLP989MARK
37-04-03-023
Peggi Ressetlement Estate
GaubeLP560CCIJ
37-04-01-075
Kuchiyako Settlment
KujeLP463CCIJ
37-04-03-008
Dafara Primary School
GaubeLP396MARK
37-04-03-026
Main Gate Open Space By Mtn Mask Abuja@30
GaubeLP381CCIJ
37-04-01-074
Union Homes Estate Gate
KujeLP371CCIJ
37-04-06-008
Tika / Primary School
RubochiLP340CCIJ
37-04-04-002
Kwaku/Primary School
KwakuAPC338CCIJ
37-04-05-001
Kabi Kassa/Primary School
KabiAPC336CCIJ

How this record was built

From inventory to local aggregation

1 · Inventory

Fix the expected units

The INEC polling-unit register supplies stable territory or state, local, ward and unit codes. Kuje contains 262 inventory units in this snapshot, which prevents source rows from silently changing the denominator.

2 · Selection

Apply one policy

Complete CCIJ observations take precedence, followed by complete Mark Essien fallbacks. Kuje's selected records break down as CCIJ 219, MARK 43. The policy is deterministic and preserves the original source label.

3 · Aggregation

Sum without declaring

Party values are summed from PU to ward and area council. Missing observations stay visible instead of being estimated. In Kuje, 262 of 262 units are represented, while the scope still excludes fourteen parties.

What this rollout preserves. The page is designed to survive a later declared-result addition without changing its URL. A future collation record would appear as a separately sourced layer beside this aggregation; it would not overwrite the PU evidence, backfill a missing total, or turn the calculated ward table into an official document. Every future update should retain the review date and show which layer changed, so readers can distinguish new source evidence from a presentation revision. Keeping that contract stable now is more important than generating hundreds of local pages at once.

Questions this page answers

Kuje evidence notes

Did LP officially win Kuje?

This page does not make that claim. It says LP leads Mundx's four-party aggregation of selected polling-unit observations. A statement about the declared area council result requires a sourced collation record at the appropriate result layer.

What does representation mean?

It reports how many inventory units have a selected observation containing all four tracked party values. It does not establish sheet authenticity, capture all eighteen parties, or reproduce every correction made during collation.

Why preserve an unavailable field?

An explicit unavailable value is safer than promoting a calculated PU sum into an official result. It also makes future source work concrete: add the declared layer only with a form level, authority URL, retrieval date and documented confidence.

How is this different from the Kuje place page?

The permanent Kuje place record describes geography across cycles. This contest page is tied to the 2023 presidential election, its evidence layers and its source limitations. The URLs serve different questions and should not duplicate one another.

Provenance

What is official, and what Mundx calculated

The current source register does not contain a declared area council collation record for this geography. Mundx therefore leaves the declared layer empty instead of inferring one from polling units.

Mundx's second layer is a four-party aggregation of selected polling-unit observations. It applies policy all-complete-ccij-first-v1: complete CCIJ records take precedence, then complete Mark Essien records fill remaining units.

Canonical PU policy all-complete-ccij-first-v1 · CCIJ commit e38e3bc9a22a
Reuse boundary. Mundx Analytics confirms permission to publish and redistribute the source-derived records in this release. No standard open-data licence or third-party bulk-reuse terms are specified.

Published by Mundx Analytics · reviewed by Mundx Analytics Data Team on 22 September 2026 · official sources retrieved 2026-08-20.